JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 23, 2006

A- de 2006

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Oscar Hernando Urazan Guevara Vs. Oficina De Accion Social Y Otros

✓
Topic · hard data
Conflicto De Competencia Entre El Juzgado Promiscuo Del Circuito De San Jose Del Guaviare Y El Tribunal Administrativo Del Meta. Ordena Al Tribunal Administrativo Del Meta Asumir El Conocimiento De La Accion De Tutela
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Accion De Tutela Contra Autoridades De Diferente Nivel
  • Competencia del juez de mayor jerarquía
Jurisdiccion Constitucional
  • No corresponde a quienes la ejercen determinar a priori contra quienes se dirige la acción de tutela
  • Garantía de la efectividad de derechos constitucionales
Acción De Tutela
  • Decreto 1382 de 2000 no establece competencia sino reglas de simple reparto
  • Responsabilidad del Presidente de la República y Ministros debe ser resuelta al momento de adoptar el fallo
Conflicto De Competencia En Tutela
  • Competencia a prevención
Decreto Reglamentario De Competencia Para Reparto De Accion De Tutela
  • Interpretación
  • Reglas fijadas determinan autoridad judicial a asumir
5 topics · 8 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. En merito de lo expuesto, la Sala Plena de la Corte Constitucional,
  2. RESUELVE:
  3. ORDENAR al Tribunal Administrativo del Meta que asuma, de forma inmediata, el conocimiento de la accion de tutela de la referencia.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.